There are times when promoting a contributor to a management role may backfire

An odd convention has fixed itself into the career psyche. It involves a widespread practice that when a worker has demonstrated specialized competency and efficiency over a period of time, then the next step in that person’s career must naturally be an elevation to a management position. A causation is assumed linking proficient performance with an ability to lead direct reports. This assumption may be oversold, resulting in the selection of many managers who find themselves unhappy and detached from what they do best.

Surely, there are many cases when a stellar individual contributor turns out to be an excellent manager of workers who do what they once did. As manager, they know intimately the challenges their subordinates face, and having been skilled in addressing them formerly, they can guide teams with heightened awareness and credibility. A once knowledgeable and experienced provider, who is also an inspiring leader, is a great combination indeed.

Unfortunately, there are times when the “advancement” of a well-versed individual contributor to management is misplaced. During these pandemic times, it is no secret that many workers are reassessing their roles. This includes managers. It is not uncommon for some managers to feel a nostalgia for work that was more purposeful and fulfilling compared to being supervisory. They remember the satisfaction they felt at being an excellent contributor, and with reflection, may realize they like that better than being a boss.

However, we are ingrained to think hierarchically. Once we have moved up, it is considered a disgrace to move back down. What will people think if I give up this management post and return to a job I once had? That will be seen as a demotion, right? Thoughts like these would discourage many managers from reversing course. If the future of one’s career is a choice between continuing in a less than satisfying management role or risk possible shame by returning to a former position, then one is very likely to feel stuck. This is not a good place to be.

One thing helping with such a conundrum is the fresh post-pandemic attitude allowing for workers to search for more meaning in their work. Just as there is now more evidence of hiring managers being more accepting of jobhopping over the past two years when they look at resumes, there may now be greater acknowledgment of managers leaving to search for greener pastures.

Reframing your traditional ideas about hierarchy may also help.

Get out ahead of any perceived criticism or doubt from others by publicly admitting that returning to a role, which again makes possible more autonomy and the practice of mastery, is a better fit for yourself than management. Stating that your career and the organization can both profit from such a move can be communicated in a way, which is both believable and face-saving.

Leadership, as well, can be viewed with old-fashioned limitations. Management jobs need not be the only way to lead. An individual contributor who trains and mentors colleagues through sharing of expertise and proven methodologies can have a greater leadership impact than someone who is overly consumed with analyzing productivity metrics of direct reports. By claiming you prefer to lead more by guidance and coaching than the old management job allowed for, you can help to substantiate your reentry move.

Then there is the possibility of retaining your management position on the hierarchy by proposing a new strategic venture that better incorporates both your individual contributor and management values. From your perch within the organization, you may be able to see more creative ways of approaching potential opportunities, which call for just the right fusion of skills you can provide.

Greater agility doesn’t just benefit organizations; it enhances careers as well.

If you are questioning your contributions due to limitations placed on you by being a manager, the time may be right for a change.

Bill Ryan writes about career, employment and economic topics from his home in North Sutton.