As New Hampshire businesses
know too well, the cost and delivery of health care is an evolving
landscape that presents more questions than answers. Medical industry
professionals can help businesses understand the most significant
changes and how to navigate them. This week, we sought insight from some
of the state’s leading experts.
Our panel: Andrew B. Eills, shareholder in Sheehan Phinney’s Healthcare Group, sheehan.com; Caitlin McCormick, vice president of sales and account management, UnitedHealthcare of New England, uhc.com.
Caitlin McCormick, VP of sales and account management, UnitedHealthcare
Q: We know the health care system is complicated. Tell us what UnitedHealthcare is trying to do to help with that?
A: We
consistently invest in ways to simplify the health care system to
provide more affordable, supportive care. So, if you think the health
care system is too complicated and due for an overhaul, you may be
pleasantly surprised by our latest innovative plan called Surest — a
health plan designed to help simplify care with upfront pricing. This is
a common-sense approach created by listening to what people want and
then giving it to them. When people hear the details, they often ask,
‘So, what’s the catch?’ I’m happy to say there isn’t one.
Q: What’s different with the Surest health plan?
A: For
starters, your benefits work for you immediately. There’s no deductible
to chip away at and no co-insurance to worry about paying weeks after
receiving care. With most traditional plans, these charges can be
financial barriers to care for some members, and they’re often just
confusing. We removed them from the plan to simplify things.
Q: You mentioned “upfront pricing.” Is that what the industry is calling “transparency?”
A: The
type of technology that offers price transparency for rideshare trips,
vacation rentals and so many other areas of life is making its way to
health care. Not only that, but health care quality data is also
becoming more easily available, helping people comparison shop for
medical care and services.
The
Surest plan, that I mentioned, makes health benefits more transparent
and easier to use, helping people to make more informed health care
choices — with the aim of lowering the total cost of care. It lists a
single, all-in price for hundreds of services. Members can review and
consider their options before deciding on care. This upfront pricing
also helps avoid billing surprises that, with a traditional health plan,
might show up weeks or months after a service or procedure.
Q: What is driving this trend in transparency, and where else are you seeing more of it?
A: Lawmakers
mandated some transparency changes in the No Surprises Act and other
legislation, including required disclosures by health plans and
hospitals. Unfortunately, some organizations are not meeting these
requirements or presenting the information in ways that are not easy to
understand. UnitedHealthcare is helping address these issues through
multiple initiatives that make quality and cost information more
actionable and personalized.
We
know health care quality and cost can vary significantly even within
the same city, which is why we offer members resources to review quality
information and cost estimates for more than 820 common medical
services. By providing this information online, via our mobile app and
through our customer care advocates, we are making it easier for them to
check on costs and make more informed decisions.
For
many people, surprise medical bills top the list of affordability
concerns. So, we want to empower our members with timely information
that could help them improve their health and perhaps save them money in
the process.
Q: What other innovations are coming to the health care market?
A: Historically,
the choice in health care funding for a smaller business has been
between the higher-cost predictability of a fully insured plan and the
potential savings, albeit with risks, of self-funding.
Now
there’s an alternative level-funded health plan which is growing in
popularity with smaller groups. Use of these plans is on the rise.
According to a recent survey, 42% of small firms report that they have a
level-funded plan, a steep increase from previous years. A level-funded
plan is an option for employers that want to move away from fully
insured health care but are not yet ready to completely self-insure.
Health insurers have designed level-funded plans to offer two main
upsides: predictability and potential savings, including through a
possible surplus refund.
For
small business owners seeking a health plan designed with affordability
in mind, an alternative like level-funding may be a solution.
Q:
Another trend we see is a big demand from employees to get better
access to behavioral health. What are insurers doing to address that?
A: An
estimated 1 in 3 Americans lives in an area with a shortage of mental
health professionals. Of those areas, two-thirds are in rural or partly
rural regions of the country.
Demand
for behavioral health support has increased and so has the need for
alternative ways to access it. This can be especially true for employees
who work outside of urban centers.
One
solution may be the network of online services that expanded during the
COVID-19 pandemic and continues to grow today, including: Self-help
apps, virtual coaching, virtual therapy, substance use cessation tools.
These
virtual services and technology-enabled solutions have all become more
widely available over the last couple of years — and that’s a good
thing.. Telehealth has clear benefits: It’s convenient, affordable and
allows users to get care where and when they need it.
These
virtual services may continue to help people: access quality care, stay
consistent with treatment, afford services and avoid stigma-related
issues. The privacy of virtual services accessed at home may make more
people feel comfortable reaching out for help.
A
final thought: While access to care is vital, it can’t be effective if
employees don’t know about it. For instance, many companies offer an
employee assistance program that includes no-cost help for managing
stress, anxiety, depression and substance use.
However,
EAP services often go unused, in part, because employees aren’t aware
of them. Don’t just create the opportunity for employees to address
mental health, make sure they know the help is available — and who to
call if they need help navigating the complexity.
Andrew B. Eills, shareholder, Sheehan Phinney’s Healthcare Group
Q: How would you describe the current state of health care access and delivery in New Hampshire?
A: Briefly,
“good,” especially compared with a number of other states. That said,
there is room for improvement and New Hampshire’s “health care
providers” (a fancy term for hospitals, community health clinics,
nursing homes, private physician groups, community mental health centers
and home health agencies) would be the first to admit that more can be
done to ensure that all citizens have easier access to care when and
where it is needed.
Q: What are a few flash points that you see in the medical profession, and how do they affect patients?
A: Every
single New Hampshire provider will tell you that staffing, particularly
in nursing homes but also throughout the industry, has been and remains
a huge test. The pandemic brought on by COVID-19 exacerbated the
challenges in recruiting and retaining the number of staff necessary to
operate efficiently and safely.
The
forces affecting the ability of health care facilities to recruit and
staff include the difficulties in finding affordable housing for workers
and alternative or
competing jobs that pay more outside of health care. While physician
staffing appears to have been more stable than staffing for other areas,
such as nursing, recruitment in New Hampshire remains a challenge,
especially in the north Country.
Obviously,
lack of staff may mean delays in the availability of patient visits or
longer waiting times for procedures. Every provider wants stability in
their staff numbers in order to provide excellent care and to train the
next generation of medical workers.
Throughout
the country, physician burnout is a subject on the front burner in
every C-suite. A number of factors are at play. One, the COVID pandemic
seems to have had the curious effect of lessening the civility that
patients formerly brought to health care institutions.
In
our hospital emergency departments, nationwide there has been a
remarkable rise in physical and verbal assaults on health provider
staff. At the same time, “boarding” patients who need to be in a
different environment contributes to stress within hospitals.
And
of course, the confluence of patient demands, time spent for and with
patients, and requirements built into electronic health records systems
increases the pressures providers feel.
Q: The U.S. has higher health care costs relative to other advanced countries. What are the trends in health care cost growth?
A: For
U.S. health care, the elephants (plural) in the room are costs and the
factors that drive them. Health care spending overall accounts for
almost one-fifth of our economy, and other large, wealthy countries
spend about half as much per person.
Medicare,
which provides health care to those over age 65 and currently serves
over 65 million, accounts for 13% of the federal budget and 21% of
national health care spending. The U.S. population as a whole is aging,
so in the coming years the number of Medicare beneficiaries will
increase.
Surprisingly,
however, annual Medicare spending per beneficiary actually has trended
downward from $13,159 in 2011 to $12,459 in 2023. We don’t know whether
this trend will continue or disappear, but efforts to shift care from
hospitals to less expensive settings may be a reason, as well as
requirements for private health insurance under the Affordable Care Act,
which on balance may have led to healthier individuals now on Medicare.
Employer-sponsored
insurance, however, has increased faster than inflation and generally
has outpaced wage growth. Employers are concerned that cost increases
are not sustainable.
At
the same time, consumers (aka patients) demand choice and transparency
in pricing, as well as certain medical services in their communities,
some of which are expensive and require clinical expertise. Our
policymakers will have to respond to these conflicting pressures.