The
Mason Planning Board is preparing to bring a zoning ordinance amendment
that will permit residents to have a detached accessory dwelling unit
(ADU) on their property to next year’s Town Meeting.
Accessory
dwelling units are apartments built on the same lot as an existing
primary residence. They can be attached to the main home, or detached
from it, with size based on a specific square footage or a percentage of
the existing home. Currently, Mason’s zoning ordinance allows attached
ADUs, and at a recent Planning Board meeting, members held a preliminary
discussion on how to best move forward with an amendment.
Cassie
Cashin, a regional planner with the Nashua Regional Planning
Commission, suggested that they look to towns like Lyndeborough, where
residents recently voted in favor of permitting detached ADUs, for
guidance on how to structure the amendment. She will also be compiling a
list of other towns that allow detached ADUs for further insight to
determine which method would work best for Mason.
Selectman
Charlie Moser noted that while many towns require that a property owner
apply for a license to have a detached ADU, that might not be the best
method for Mason since the town lacks the necessary infrastructure.
“We don’t have the staff — an administrative structure just doesn’t make sense,” he said.
Instead,
the town could consider allowing detached ADUs either by right,
variance or special exception. Cashin noted that towns which allow
detached ADUs by right usually require that the property owner to apply
for a building permit. In that case, a building inspector would inspect
the ADU in the same way as a main residential building.
Since
the town already has a building permit and inspection system in place,
Moser expressed interest in potentially going that route.
“A lot of towns do that, and it works fine,” Cashin said. “It eliminates a lot of paperwork and procedure.”
The
board also discussed holding at least two public hearings for Mason
residents to voice their input on the proposed amendment.
Vice
Chair Dane Rota suggested the board look to the language in the
ordinance allowing attached ADUs to use in the proposed amendment. He
told the other board members they should review the current ordinance
and prepare for a more-detailed discussion of the issue during next
month’s meeting.
This article is being shared by partners in The Granite State News Collaborative. For more information, visit collaborativenh.org.