Reps also back employee ‘conscientious objector exemption’ on vaccine
The full NH House of Representatives, on a 172-164 nearly party-line vote, approved repeal of Gov. Chris Sununu’s Granite State Paid Family Leave Plan, two weeks before it’s due to go out to bid.
Sununu’s voluntary program, an alternative to a mandatory program mainly backed by Democrats, was rebuked by his own party. Only 16 Republicans voted to reject House Bill 1165, while all but three Democrats voted to defeat the nascent program.
But Democrats didn’t vote for the family leave plan because they don’t necessarily like it.
“I ask you not to repeal a program that I cannot possibly vote for,” said Joshua Adjutant, D-Enfield. “This is an upward redistribution of wealth from the working class to the permanent management class and doesn’t benefit those who need the program the most.” Still, Adjutant urged rejecting repeal and instead try to improve it.
“Any family and medical leave program is better than no family medical leave,” said Rep Brian Sullivan, D-Grantham, who urged lawmakers to reject this “premature repeal.”
House
Republicans, however, wanted to kill the plan before it got started.
They were miffed that the program was slipped into last year’s budget,
denying lawmakers a standalone vote.
Unless
they took this “short window of opportunity” to repeal the plan “while
still in its infancy,” we will “forever after be stuck with another
taxpayer-funded social entitlement scheme,” argued Rep. Leonard
Turcotte, R-Barrington.
Turcotte
noted that the government agency that would implement the plan did
little to defend it before lawmakers, except for an appearance last week
by Insurance Commissioner Chris Nicolopoulos minutes before the House
Labor Committee voted on the bill.
In
that appearance, Nicolopoulos called the plan a “phenomenal
compromise,” since it offered the benefit to everyone without mandating
universal participation, unlike the Democratic proposal, which Sununu
vetoed, was based on a half-percent payroll deduction.
The governor’s plan would piggyback on a family leave benefit provided to the state’s 11,000 employees at
taxpayers’ expense. A request for proposals to select an insurance
company to handle the program is due to be sent out this month. The
program itself is supposed to start at the end of the year.
Employers
who wish to participate in the program would receive a business tax
credit equal to half of their outlay. Individuals who choose to
participate would pay a premium capped at $5 a week. The premium would
be subsidized by earmarking proceeds of an insurance tax paid by the
provider to the program.
It’s a program that backers call unique because it has never been tried before.
Turcotte
argued that it is no longer needed because one company has offered to
sell family leave insurance in New Hampshire without government
incentives. The product doesn’t include leave for workers covered, just
their family, so it would have to be patched together with a short-term
disability policy.
Despite
the repeal vote, the Granite State Paid Family Leave Plan isn’t dead
yet. Repeal might receive a chillier reception in the Senate, which put
the plan into the budget in the first
place. And even if the repeal plan passes both chambers, the House vote
alone indicated that it is far short of the necessary votes to overcome a
likely gubernatorial veto.
Following
the repeal vote, lawmakers easily passed HB 1210, which would allow
workers to refuse an employer’s vaccination mandate with a
“conscientious objector exemption,” despite warnings from the NH
Hospital Association that it could risk $2 billion of funding from
Medicaid and Medicare, which require that hospitals mandate vaccines and
don’t allow for conscience objections. Just medical and religious.
Later,
the House tabled HB 1369, a bill that would have given performing arts
venues the right to mandate vaccinations and other safety measures like
masking and social distancing, to reassure nervous patrons to come back
to the theater.
And
earlier, the full House voted 169-152 to table HB 1076, which would
prohibit productivity quotas that don’t allow enough time for workers to
take a break. Turcotte said that considerable time could be saved by
not debating the measure.