Page 2

Loading...
Tips: Click on articles from page
Page 2 5,570 viewsPrint | Download

Advocates of promoting changes to local land-use policies in order to spur development of affordable housing may have been handed a setback in February when the House Municipal and County Government Committee recommended killing House Bill 1087, which would limit town zoning ordinances related to minimum lot size. But that same panel did vote to endorse another measure, HB 1177, which advocates say should spur the creation of so-called “missing middle” housing — duplexes, triple-deckers and quads — by requiring that municipalities allow up to four-unit apartment buildings in areas that are served by municipal water and sewer.

The bill, sponsored by a bipartisan group of legislators “relegalizes” smaller multifamily buildings, which were once ubiquitous in many New Hampshire communities, said Rep. Ivy Vann, D-Peterborough, prime sponsor of the measure and a town and urban planner by profession.

Many communities allowed such housing years ago but added restrictions in the suburban era after World War II, furthering sprawl.


Democratic House Rep. Ivy Vann, of Peterborough

While HB 1177 basically would require municipalities to allow buildings of up to four units, a developer would still have to follow all local regulations that apply to other houses, such as setbacks. It also allows the conversion of existing buildings into up to four units.

A key attraction of building “missing middle” housing, Vann said, is that the people developing the buildings will most likely be local residents and others from inside New Hampshire.

“Big development firms are not going to come from California and build a fourplex in a small town,” Vann said. “This is a bill that privileges big construction companies.”

Not everyone supports the measure, including the NH Municipal Association, which its government affairs counsel, Natch Greyes, called “a statewide zoning mandate” at a Feb. 7 hearing on HB 1177. He said the association’s members “oppose statewide zoning mandates” and “support local control.”

But Vann said she was “cautiously optimistic” that the bill would be passed by the full House before moving to the Senate, where Majority Leader Jeb Bradley, R-Wolfeboro, is a sponsor.

— JEFF FEINGOLD

See also